State Vets Plan to Eliminate Brucellosis in Yellowstone Bison

Tools

By Alden Downing

HELENA - It may be good news in the making for livestock producers in the Yellowstone Valley.

A meeting last Friday between state livestock officials in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho was the first step in creating a long term plan to eliminate the spread of brucellosis in the area. One plan is to test all bison at capture facilities, vaccinate those who test negative and slaughter those testing positive.

Another plan would be to use immuno contraception in brucellosis positive animals to stop them from reproducing and, as a result, spreading the disease. "No matter what kind of plan that we use it has to be socially acceptable," explained state veterinarian Marty Zaluski. "So that's a real important component. Secondarily is they are free ranging animals but they can, at the same time, be managed. But none the less, there is a lot, there are some challenges in wildlife."

One major challenge is the complicated jurisdiction over the Yellowstone Valley. Being spread over the three state area creates obvious issues. Add in that bison are federally managed animals and that another agency, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, manages elk in the area which also spread the disease. But if they can all get on the same page, officials are confident the threat of infection can be stopped.

"If we eliminate brucellosis from bison in the park, the prevalence in elk will decrease. And then also we will need to work with Wyoming to decrease or eliminate feed grounds in Wyoming to also reduce that reservoir of infection."

The bottom line, Zaluski says, the Yellowstone Valley is the only place in America brucellosis continues to affect wildlife and livestock. And it poses a significant risk that they are working to eliminate.

Saturday, Aug 8 at 4:42 PM Dorothy Landers wrote ...

Wyomites and Montanamites do not own Yellowstone,at least the last I heard, it was a National Park. Don't all US citizens own the Nat'l parks. Innoculate the bef female cows, or get them away form Yellowstone.

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 10:06 PM mememe wrote ...

Lets just get a cure figured out so that if it is suspected a person or animal has it then treat the problem to stop the spreading. Wiether this means darting all the bison to save them..... or on the occational elk or deer. If we work hard to manage the cattle and vacinate them then the bison might have a chance. They are the ones we need to be focusing on here which is why they are the topic of discussion! We need to have a cure and a good proven vaccination to get this under control!!!

Saturday, Sep 20 at 10:37 PM Seth wrote ...

For anyone who says people do not get it please don't tell that to my wife and I who have been fighting her case ofBrucellosis for over 5 months and we continue. People CAN and DO get it. It was developed as biological warefare to use on humans in the 40's-50's. There are a couple hundred REPORTED cases every year. While people deny it is a factor it continues to effect people. I am a huge fan of hunting and beef but this disease needs to be erraticated before it gets out of control AGAIN.

Thursday, Jul 10 at 4:43 PM wildbuffalo wrote ...

"If we eliminate brucellosis from bison in the park, the prevalence in elk will decrease." What is the logic here? Aren't there more elk than bison? Wildlife is NOT livestock. Wildlife should NOT be managed by the livestock industry.

Thursday, Jul 3 at 8:17 PM mostlyMike wrote ...

The brucelosis problem is primarily a problem of elk, not bison. The focus of these state vets on bison shows they are not serious about doing anything. It's politically easy to attack Yellowstone Park, but most of infection is from Jackson Hole, Wyoming south to the area around Pinedale, Wy.

Thursday, Jul 3 at 6:02 AM Ann wrote ...

Brucellosis infected meat, when cooked poses no threat whatsoever. Now we have a 20 State recall of beef from Nebraska because of ecoli. What is more serious do you think? definitely NOT the brucellosis meat.

Wednesday, Jul 2 at 11:12 PM Nathan wrote ...

this is bad news for everyone. The ranchers are barking up the wrong tree and will not solve the problem and a national icon the last free ranging buffalo herd in the world will be manipulated and injured further.

Wednesday, Jul 2 at 4:22 PM rangergirl wrote ...

This is a political problem, NOT a wildlife problem. The laws need to be changed. Brucellosis WAS a disease humans could catch, but with pasteurization, this has become a non-issue for humans. There is no good reason to worry about it. The disease should be ignored and the archaic laws changed. Then, ranchers would be able to decide whether to innoculate their cattle or let the disease take its course in their livestock. Ranchers: work to change the laws, not change wildlife.

Wednesday, Jul 2 at 2:35 PM catbestland wrote ...

And what is to stop the elk from giving the disease to the bison that survive this new unwarranted slaughter? Are they going to slaughter all the elk too. Why stop there? Why not kill everything that poses a threat, no matter how imagined it may be, to the sacred cow? The disease needs to managed directly within the livestock herds. After all, they are the ones that brought it to our wildlife. PEOPLE--STOP EATING BEEF.

Wednesday, Jul 2 at 6:59 AM rangergirl wrote ...

1. By slaughtering brucellosis-positive bison, we may be weakening the genetic pool as positive means exposure not sickness. 2. It will never be 'socially acceptable' to round up and test/kill bison. 3. Better to manage cattle w/more effective vaccines and limit cattle presence on lands near Yellowstone. Deal w/the issue on the human end, not the wildlife side of things. 4.Other wildlife can carry brucellosis. 5. There are other issues than just brucellosis here. We need to educate ourselves

Wednesday, Jul 2 at 6:26 AM Ann wrote ...

What kind of fools does Zaluski take us for. Yellowstone is NOT the only place when you have feral pigs carrying the disease in the south. There is NO way they can eradicate the disease in the wildlife. Quit wasting time and money on the wildlife and work on the cattle. They have not proven it was from the wildlife that the cattle got it. Just like the airports, they don't search every one that gets on a plane, they don't inspect EVERY cow either.

Tuesday, Jul 1 at 7:43 PM buffalorunner wrote ...

Good news for livestock industry, bad news if you are one the few remaining Yellowstone bison fortunate enough to survive the draconian management actions imposed by state federal agencies this past winter and the extreme winter conditions which drove these animals out of the park. Dobson & Meagher (1996)demonstrated that unacceptably high levels of culling would be required to eradicate brucellosis in the park and require a population reduction to about 200 animals. Would they go this far?!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KULR-8 News, Sports, Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

Your Weather Authority

Icon
Current Temp -3.0 °F
Fog in Vicinity
Wind : South at
8.1 mph
Humidity : 86 %
Pressure : 30.01 in
More Weather

State Farm Sky Cam

More Weather

AP Video

On Demand

Stock Quotes

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Cast Your Vote

Does the recall affect your view of Toyota?

  • Yes
  • No

Links We Like